←back to thread

251 points QiuChuck | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.283s | source
Show context
sbszllr ◴[] No.45892481[source]
As someone who has a mirrorless scanning setup for my film, and pondered getting a dedicated scanner... the price of this is quite steep given how inflexible of a tool it is.

A second hand DSLR setup is going to be roughly the same price or less. I'm also not sure what kind of workflow improvements it actually offers. If you want fancy and experimental, filmomat has arguably a more interesting but pricier offering.

But naysaying aside, I hope they manage to find a niche that allows them to survive as a company, and keep the analog photography revival alive.

replies(4): >>45892677 #>>45892703 #>>45892752 #>>45893614 #
deinonychus ◴[] No.45892703[source]
I almost missed the price. Wow you're right that's a lot! And the final retail price is 1599 euros. I have a good Plustek that cost me $300 or $400. Automated transport and unantiquated software sounds nice, but those features are not worth an extra $600-1,100 to me.

Am I missing something or is this supposed to be in another tier of image quality?

replies(3): >>45892857 #>>45894628 #>>45895620 #
ZeWaka ◴[] No.45892857[source]
It's actually a lower DPI and no IR sensor.
replies(1): >>45893445 #
gorgoiler ◴[] No.45893445[source]
Honestly I feel like anything beyond 5 megapixels per frame is pushing beyond reasonable expectations with 35mm. This is certainly the case with any kind of available light or high speed work in silver-halide process, the area where I figure most people are going to be using this device. Lab-work in C41 and E6 is definitely possible at home but must account for single digit percentage of the home analogue market.
replies(4): >>45893584 #>>45893657 #>>45895651 #>>45898650 #
gsich ◴[] No.45893584[source]
Never. 20 Mp if you want "lossless".
replies(1): >>45893634 #
1. gorgoiler ◴[] No.45893634[source]
I think I see what you mean. It’s the difference between having an image showing the shape and texture of each film grain, and an image which looks like what I saw in the camera and which isn’t going to be any sharper. The former has value but the latter was always good enough for me and, surprisingly, rather low in resolution compared to subsequent DSLRs and mirrorless cameras I bought in the 2010s.

Ilford Delta 400 pushed two stops to 1600 ASA in a 1970s Asahi Pentax SP1000 was always going to produce… artistic results, requiring as much imagination as acuity to appreciate the subject. (Read: see past the blur.)