←back to thread

135 points toomanyrichies | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
terminalshort ◴[] No.45862403[source]
I fundamentally don't understand the rights of government employees. They are supposedly there to execute the will of the political branch that controls them whether or not they agree with it, which is why they are given immunity from firing by each incoming administration. So how do they also have the right to personalized communication from their work email addresses (a right that no private sector employee has)? How can they have the right to exercise government authority without being democratically elected, or at least accountable for their actions to someone who is?
replies(4): >>45862414 #>>45862467 #>>45862579 #>>45862621 #
jmull ◴[] No.45862621[source]
The US government can exert control over aspects of employee communications related to their job function.

The US government cannot require employees to express political views unrelated to their job function.

The US constitution places restrictions on the government that don’t necessarily apply to private sector employers (or that don’t apply in the same way).

replies(1): >>45863178 #
1. jalapenos ◴[] No.45863178[source]
What does this mean in practice, the signature override just needed to add " - Trump" at the end to be kosher?