←back to thread

116 points 1vuio0pswjnm7 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.238s | source
Show context
asim ◴[] No.45788244[source]
Tens of billions spent on AI data centers. But people still starve across the planet. Amazing.
replies(15): >>45788266 #>>45788321 #>>45788351 #>>45788376 #>>45788378 #>>45788389 #>>45788428 #>>45788457 #>>45788889 #>>45795181 #>>45795426 #>>45795997 #>>45796537 #>>45796623 #>>45809622 #
pfannkuchen ◴[] No.45796623[source]
Population numbers in all areas where this is widespread exploded after the introduction of efficient agriculture from outside. Like if lack of food was the root problem, we would expect population in these places to be decreasing, not increasing, right? Something other than food scarcity is at play here.
replies(1): >>45797033 #
sigmoid10 ◴[] No.45797033[source]
That's a logical fallacy. Population growth can outgrow food supply thanks to high fertility and access to better hygiene and medical treatment from outside combined with a lack of birth control. So you would still see population growth, but a growing fraction of this population could be malnourished.

That being said, the most common reason is simply war. If you look at the famine in Sudan right now, it is a direct consequence of the civil war (which also happens to be the biggest and bloodiest war by far in the world right now). Lost crops from weather or diseases can also restrict local food production, but it only ever really turns into a problem when armed groups prevent outside food supplies from moving to affected areas like the military in Sudan does right now.

replies(1): >>45807867 #
1. pfannkuchen ◴[] No.45807867[source]
You are telling me that every infomercial I’ve ever seen about starving children in Africa was from war? How often are these people at war?