←back to thread

113 points 1vuio0pswjnm7 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
asim ◴[] No.45788244[source]
Tens of billions spent on AI data centers. But people still starve across the planet. Amazing.
replies(14): >>45788266 #>>45788321 #>>45788351 #>>45788376 #>>45788378 #>>45788389 #>>45788428 #>>45788457 #>>45788889 #>>45795181 #>>45795426 #>>45795997 #>>45796537 #>>45796623 #
1. chii ◴[] No.45788378[source]
i think a good counter to this sort of argument is :

https://launiusr.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/why-explore-space-...

replies(1): >>45790054 #
2. frm88 ◴[] No.45790054[source]
Wow! This has aged really, really badly. 50 years and many billions of dollars later and we're neither on the Moon or Mars or have significantly enhanced the distribution of food to those in need, let alone international cooperation.

Higher food production through survey and assessment from orbit, and better food distribution through improved international relations, are only two examples of how profoundly the space program will impact life on Earth.

As good counters go, this underperforms.

replies(2): >>45790366 #>>45801051 #
3. tim333 ◴[] No.45790366[source]
I agree the space program was a bit of a flop but food distribution and poverty stuff has improved

Extreme poverty from 45% to less than 10% https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty-in-brief

Famine deaths about 1/3 https://ourworldindata.org/famines

4. JuniperMesos ◴[] No.45801051[source]
It didn't age badly at all. This prediction was dead-on accurate. The widespread use of satellite monitoring of the Earth's surface has paid huge dividends for humanity in all sorts of ways including better and cheaper food production. Also the GPS system alone has been hugely important for every human system that involves navigating from one place on the Earth to another, which of course includes food transport as well as many many other things relevant to people's lives and health.