←back to thread

You can't refuse to be scanned by ICE's facial recognition app, DHS document say

(www.404media.co)
574 points nh43215rgb | 1 comments | 01 Nov 25 08:58 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ktallett ◴[01 Nov 25 12:02 UTC] No.45780988[source]▶
Why exactly have ICE been given limitless power? Facial recognition is at best right more than half the time, but many studies have shown it to be consistently faulty leading to many wrong ID's. What is the point of a database with incorrect biometric data connected to a person?
replies(11): >>45781281 #>>45781284 #>>45781294 #>>45781410 #>>45781531 #>>45781652 #>>45782048 #>>45782059 #>>45782431 #>>45782440 #>>45784642 #
AtlasBarfed ◴[01 Nov 25 12:57 UTC] No.45781284[source]▶
Because half of American voters want fascism.
replies(4): >>45781594 #>>45781728 #>>45781899 #>>45782453 #
mothballed ◴[01 Nov 25 14:28 UTC] No.45781899[source]▶
Democrats threw the election by telling their primary voters party base to go fuck themselves and instead just jammed through an unpopular candidate (even in her home state) at the 11th hour.
replies(2): >>45781997 #>>45783233 #
wat10000 ◴[01 Nov 25 14:43 UTC] No.45781997{3}[source]▶
I really enjoy the American political dynamic where Democrats are the only ones considered to have any agency. If Democrats do it, it’s Democrats’ fault. If Republicans do it, it’s Democrats’ fault for provoking them or not doing enough to stop them. Nothing is ever the responsibility of the people who cast their votes for Trump.
replies(5): >>45782128 #>>45782131 #>>45782141 #>>45783041 #>>45787746 #
fastball ◴[01 Nov 25 16:36 UTC] No.45783041{4}[source]▶
The American people have agency and are responsible for the candidates they elect.

But part of this process is candidates being nominated by the major parties, and the RNC put forward a candidate that people actually wanted to elect. The DNC did a worse job of this, as a seeming plurality of votes for Harris were not because they liked her, but because she was "not Trump".

Both parties have agency, but the DNC did a worse job at picking their nominee (assuming the goal was to win an election).

replies(1): >>45784764 #
anigbrowl ◴[01 Nov 25 19:53 UTC] No.45784764{5}[source]▶
This is a sideshow. Harris was a poor candidate, and lost a ton of votes because she refused to commit to a ceasefire in Gaza. Th larger problem is the Dems lining up behind the idea of running Biden again even though he was obviously inadequate.

Dem flaws aside, Trump isn't just 'a candidate people actually wanted to elect'. He's an authoritarian, every major prediction about how authoritarian this administration would be has turned out to be correct, he instigated efforts to overturn the result of the last election where he lost, and 25-30% of the voting population likes authoritarianism and do not give a shit about what the Constitution actually says.

replies(1): >>45788038 #
fastball ◴[02 Nov 25 05:31 UTC] No.45788038{6}[source]▶
You can call it a sideshow, but it kinda seems like the DNC want the authoritarian to win as long as they keep scoring own goals.
replies(1): >>45788264 #
1. anigbrowl ◴[02 Nov 25 06:37 UTC] No.45788264{7}[source]▶
What I mean is teh arguments over nomination process are a sideshow. I did not want Biden to run again, but the president getting waved through to run for a second term is a totally normal thing, and normalcy bias is a major Democratic flaw. I don't care so much about Harris picking up the candidacy without a primary when Biden dropped out, it wasn't ideal but a rushed primary would have been a different sort of shitshow.