←back to thread

100 points speckx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
GolfPopper ◴[] No.45774667[source]
Piracy is just the excuse. What they're saying is that Amazon will allow a collection of corporations (including Amazon) to decide what you're allowed to do with the hardware they pretended to let you buy.
replies(4): >>45774737 #>>45774875 #>>45775788 #>>45777140 #
freedomben ◴[] No.45774875[source]
Indeed. I wonder if in these executive conversations anyone ever asks the question, "Music has been purchaseable now without DRM for quite a while. Why has music piracy essentially died but movies/TV shows/etc is still as hot as ever?"
replies(5): >>45775087 #>>45775324 #>>45775380 #>>45775902 #>>45776553 #
JambalayaJimbo ◴[] No.45775380[source]
How many musicians make their living off of recorded music anymore?
replies(2): >>45775468 #>>45775568 #
mlrtime ◴[] No.45775468[source]
The real question is how many make a living now vs when music piracy was at it's highest.

My guess is it's higher.

replies(3): >>45775853 #>>45775989 #>>45776145 #
1. bluescrn ◴[] No.45775853[source]
The Napster era was the period when I bought the most CDs, by a large margin.

It was new+exciting, I was discovering lots of new music. But at that point, casual piracy over slow connections (low-bitrate often-poorly-encoded MP3s) wasn't quite good enough to replace real CDs. And back then, MP3 was still a 'nerdy computer thing' and CD players were everywhere - and by far the most convenient way to play music on a proper hi-fi, in a car, etc.

But these days, there isn't really the same upgrade path from a lower-quality pirated copy to an authentic copy. Especially with TV/movies, now tied to subscription services and encumbered by increasing levels of ads.