←back to thread

269 points youz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
LambdaComplex ◴[] No.45688223[source]
YouTube shorts baffle me, in a way. "We've spent 20 years developing the perfect user interface for watching videos...now let's throw it all away and remove almost every feature so that it's more like TikTok."
replies(6): >>45688313 #>>45688319 #>>45688411 #>>45691309 #>>45691442 #>>45692077 #
wvenable ◴[] No.45688313[source]
Youtube Shorts are apparently very popular; so even if they aren't our cup of tea, you can't argue with success.
replies(10): >>45688458 #>>45688463 #>>45688498 #>>45688538 #>>45688733 #>>45688748 #>>45691165 #>>45691315 #>>45691763 #>>45696536 #
1. Timwi ◴[] No.45688538[source]
I can absolutely argue about what measure of success to apply. If you're only focused on what makes you money, then you're successful according to this one metric, but you're a psychopath and you're hurting your users. And it's millions of users because you're maximizing for that.

If you instead make a great product that is liked by a select audience, and that doesn't cause them brainrot, then you have succeeded on a different metric.

Which metric is more conducive to a successful society?