(cleantechnica.com)

Show context

hoistbypetard ◴[23 Oct 25 03:55 UTC] No.45678022[source]▶

I hope it's on the way, but I don't think the Pioneer Na is yet a sign of this revolution. This detailed review didn't leave me in a hurry to go get one, anyway:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoZ_g_MShTw

replies(3): >>45678396 #>>45678437 #>>45680342 #

cyberax ◴[23 Oct 25 05:21 UTC] No.45678396[source]▶

>>45678022 #

The idea is not that Na-Ion batteries are better than LFPs, they are not. The main goal is to make them dirt cheap.

It seems that $15 per kWh of storage should be achievable with them. At this price, it's trivial to install enough grid-scale storage to completely move off fossil fuels in more southern areas.

replies(5): >>45678535 #>>45678602 #>>45679257 #>>45679956 #>>45680085 #

measurablefunc[dead post] ◴[23 Oct 25 05:56 UTC] No.45678602[source]▶

>>45678396 #

[flagged]

cyberax ◴[23 Oct 25 05:58 UTC] No.45678616[source]▶

>>45678602 #

> California batteries are constantly going up in flames.

What is the fraction of California batteries that went up in flames during the last year?

replies(1): >>45678630 #

measurablefunc[dead post] ◴[23 Oct 25 06:00 UTC] No.45678630[source]▶

>>45678616 #

[flagged]

1. jrflowers ◴[23 Oct 25 06:45 UTC] No.45678909[source]▶

>>45678630 #

I like that you made a post complaining about people not sourcing their claims and then eight minutes later made a post declining to source your particular claim

replies(1): >>45678930 #

2. measurablefunc ◴[23 Oct 25 06:48 UTC] No.45678930[source]▶

>>45678909 (TP) #

Link is right there. You're welcome to recover whatever stats are interesting to you instead of asking strangers to do free work.

replies(1): >>45678979 #

3. jrflowers ◴[23 Oct 25 06:57 UTC] No.45678979[source]▶

>>45678930 #

The information requested does not exist in the link you posted.

replies(1): >>45678990 #

4. measurablefunc ◴[23 Oct 25 06:57 UTC] No.45678990{3}[source]▶

>>45678979 #

That's odd. I wonder why they wouldn't provide that information.