←back to thread

282 points montyanderson | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
amelius ◴[] No.45675056[source]
How long until we see blockbuster movies produced by a guy in his basement for <$1000?
replies(17): >>45675093 #>>45675094 #>>45675098 #>>45675190 #>>45675223 #>>45675247 #>>45675311 #>>45675313 #>>45675412 #>>45675429 #>>45675453 #>>45675483 #>>45675530 #>>45675818 #>>45675994 #>>45676309 #>>45676702 #
dragonwriter ◴[] No.45675818[source]
> How long until we see blockbuster movies produced by a guy in his basement for <$1000?

Probably never. If AI is good enough to cover all the skills needed to do what would currently make a blockbuster movie for less than $1000, the demand for movies will be small enough relative to supply that there will be no such thing as a “blockbuster movie”

replies(3): >>45676041 #>>45676459 #>>45676799 #
dweekly ◴[] No.45676459[source]
The same argument could reasonably be used to explain why no YouTube influencer would ever get more than 1,000 subscribers - if everyone can upload videos that anyone can watch, nobody will really be famous because fame will become very evenly distributed, right?
replies(2): >>45676567 #>>45677195 #
1. dragonwriter ◴[] No.45676567[source]
> The same argument could reasonably be used to explain why no YouTube influencer would ever get more than 1,000 subscribers -

No, that would require a radically different argument, in pretty much every way.

> if everyone can upload videos that anyone can watch, nobody will really be famous because fame will become very evenly distributed, right?

No, Youtube makes distribution cheap, but it doesn't substitute for most of the other things that differentiate between videos; most of the skills that provide variation between videos are still there, and not cheaply substituted via YouTube.