Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    45 points cwmartin | 11 comments | | HN request time: 0.968s | source | bottom
    Show context
    zjp ◴[] No.45676449[source]
    That's a real dealbreaker. I've never seen an in-house media/nav system better than Apple's, and I don't expect GM's to be any different.
    replies(1): >>45676480 #
    1. al_borland ◴[] No.45676480[source]
    It’s not only that, but your phone already has all your data. Calendar appointments, addresses of contacts, music, podcasts, etc.

    Do replicate this, you’d either need to sync all of that to your car, or migrate to Google’s ecosystem… maybe both.

    With the track record of automakers and data privacy, I don’t know who would knowingly do that. It also seems like a giant pain when nearly every other car doesn’t ask the buyer to make this kind of choice.

    replies(4): >>45676553 #>>45676688 #>>45676753 #>>45677001 #
    2. arthurcolle ◴[] No.45676553[source]
    They will 100% reverse this decision. Surprising it made it past engineering strategy & leadership at a company as large as GM and that they would even float this publicly without the details... but this will be walked back.

    How large companies can make it so far and still have such insane decision-making (management by instinct?) is so wild to behold.

    replies(2): >>45676643 #>>45678291 #
    3. kevvok ◴[] No.45676643[source]
    I think that'll only happen when and if the corresponding drop in sales offsets increases in revenue from the subscription services owners will be forced to use. When they announced this originally for EVs it was clear the underlying motivation was to convert owners from a one-time source of income into an ongoing stream by forcing them into a subscription model for features they would get from CarPlay/Android Auto.
    replies(1): >>45676703 #
    4. ianburrell ◴[] No.45676688[source]
    Also, doing the communication would require cooperation from Google and Apple. Who have their competing systems, and don't want to cooperate with every car makers who wants to build their own system.
    5. arthurcolle ◴[] No.45676703{3}[source]
    I don't drive so I just look at the whole industry from afar
    6. tree_enjoyer ◴[] No.45676753[source]
    My Pre-Carplay car handles all of this (well, except calendar) just fine. It's all still handled on my device.

    Additionally, even if Toyota were to get breached, they would not get my data

    replies(1): >>45676862 #
    7. garciasn ◴[] No.45676862[source]
    I won’t claim to be a CarPlay expert, but it is my understanding that it just mirrors your device on the infotainment system of the vehicle.
    replies(1): >>45676960 #
    8. Jtsummers ◴[] No.45676960{3}[source]
    Yes, it's basically just an I/O device. When your phone is disconnected from it, there's no data left in the car except whatever is needed for wireless pairing (if you use wireless pairing) in the future. With wired CarPlay, it retains as much as a dumb touch screen display would.
    9. bigstrat2003 ◴[] No.45677001[source]
    Yeah exactly. My wife's Volvo runs Android as its entertainment OS, and I still choose to use Android Auto. Because my phone has my music, has the music player I like to use, etc. The car has none of these things. There is no scenario where the car's software is going to be a superior experience to plugging in your smartphone, IMO.
    10. bizzletk ◴[] No.45678291[source]
    If you have 100% confidence about this, you could make a lot of money on betting platforms like Polymarket.

    I'm sure someone would take the other side of your odds, and if you're right, you win.

    replies(1): >>45679100 #
    11. nwienert ◴[] No.45679100{3}[source]
    Not really, you’d have to pick a time frame and beyond a couple years not many will be willing.