←back to thread

375 points begueradj | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
Show context
yard2010 ◴[] No.45666375[source]
[flagged]
replies(11): >>45666388 #>>45666409 #>>45666426 #>>45666495 #>>45666530 #>>45666553 #>>45666617 #>>45666725 #>>45666829 #>>45673090 #>>45673968 #
tauwauwau ◴[] No.45666530[source]
Law doesn't seek to punish but to rehabilitate. Act of taking freedom away from the criminal is violent enough. Treating them badly is just a sign of unfair/poor society that cannot maintain (afford to keep) it's promise to be civil to all citizens.
replies(9): >>45666615 #>>45666756 #>>45666812 #>>45669346 #>>45669778 #>>45670814 #>>45670846 #>>45671681 #>>45673245 #
Tepix ◴[] No.45666756[source]
> Law doesn't seek to punish but to rehabilitate.

That's unfortunately not universally true. This is most obvious when considering the death penalty.

Norway exemplifies a rehabilitative justice model and it is effective, evidenced by low recidivism rates.

replies(3): >>45667338 #>>45668684 #>>45670750 #
Teever ◴[] No.45670750[source]
A death penalty doesn't have to intrinsically be about punishment.

It can be about removing the threat that a person poses from society permanently.

It can be about making the victims feel a sense of relief and justice.

replies(1): >>45674229 #
1. bagels ◴[] No.45674229[source]
The point being made is that the death penalty does not serve a rehabilitation purpose for a pretty obvious reason.