←back to thread

375 points begueradj | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
yard2010 ◴[] No.45666375[source]
[flagged]
replies(11): >>45666388 #>>45666409 #>>45666426 #>>45666495 #>>45666530 #>>45666553 #>>45666617 #>>45666725 #>>45666829 #>>45673090 #>>45673968 #
tauwauwau ◴[] No.45666530[source]
Law doesn't seek to punish but to rehabilitate. Act of taking freedom away from the criminal is violent enough. Treating them badly is just a sign of unfair/poor society that cannot maintain (afford to keep) it's promise to be civil to all citizens.
replies(9): >>45666615 #>>45666756 #>>45666812 #>>45669346 #>>45669778 #>>45670814 #>>45670846 #>>45671681 #>>45673245 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45670814[source]
> Law doesn't seek to punish but to rehabilitate

The purposes are punishment are deterrence, retribution, and rehabilitation [1]. (Incapacitation is also typically considered in sentencing.)

The potential deterrence and retributive benefits of cruel have been known for ages. It’s why jailers did it. Those potential benefits are balanced against rehabilitation. But that doesn’t make it the supreme consideration, particularly for crimes of corruption.

[1] https://web.uncg.edu/dcl/courses/vicecrime/pdf/m7.pdf