←back to thread

404 points voxleone | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.418s | source
Show context
bahmboo ◴[] No.45660320[source]
"The president and I want to get to the moon in this president's term" - Sean Duffy NASA administrator.

A scary way to set a schedule on a complex project with lives at stake. They don't care though.

replies(23): >>45660416 #>>45660527 #>>45660821 #>>45660902 #>>45660920 #>>45660957 #>>45661025 #>>45661086 #>>45661197 #>>45661359 #>>45661924 #>>45662101 #>>45662301 #>>45663008 #>>45663548 #>>45663848 #>>45663936 #>>45664547 #>>45665860 #>>45666795 #>>45667744 #>>45670520 #>>45686581 #
WalterBright ◴[] No.45660416[source]
Having a deadline is how things get done. With no deadline, nothing gets accomplished.
replies(6): >>45660444 #>>45660462 #>>45660483 #>>45660550 #>>45660916 #>>45661152 #
bahmboo ◴[] No.45660462[source]
This is a political deadline with no grounding in reality.
replies(8): >>45660522 #>>45660593 #>>45660629 #>>45660678 #>>45660703 #>>45660846 #>>45660855 #>>45661417 #
oceanplexian ◴[] No.45660629[source]
JFK proposed we go to the Moon in 1962. We did it in 1969, 7 years later.
replies(3): >>45660814 #>>45660904 #>>45660956 #
ambicapter ◴[] No.45660904[source]
Crucially, not during his term (or his life, but that's irrelevant).
replies(3): >>45661059 #>>45666295 #>>45668753 #
felipeerias ◴[] No.45666295[source]
The moon landing would have probably happened during JFK’s second term, if he hadn’t been assassinated and if the Apollo 1 tragedy hadn’t set the project back significantly.
replies(1): >>45668159 #
1. ambicapter ◴[] No.45668159[source]
I don't think his assassination had anything to do with Apollo 1, so I take it it probably would've still happened even if he were alive. Similarly, I don't think his assassination set back the project (ChatGPT says it probably reinforced support for the program, if anything, fwiw).

So, I imagine if he hadn't been assassinated, they probably would've landed on the moon around the same time, which would be after a possible 2nd term (unless he lost re-election and then won again).

replies(1): >>45675225 #
2. ambicapter ◴[] No.45675225[source]
Can't edit but when I said

> so I take it it probably would've still happened

I'm talking about the Apollo 1 fire.