←back to thread

Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server

(disco.cloud)
804 points jryio | 1 comments | 21 Oct 25 20:28 UTC | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
speedgoose ◴[21 Oct 25 21:12 UTC] No.45661785[source]▶
Looking at the htop screenshot, I notice the lack of swap. You may want to enable earlyoom, so your whole server doesn't go down when a service goes bananas. The Linux Kernel OOM killer is often a bit too late to trigger.

You can also enable zram to compress ram, so you can over-provision like the pros'. A lot of long-running software leaks memory that compresses pretty well.

Here is how I do it on my Hetzner bare-metal servers using Ansible: https://gist.github.com/fungiboletus/794a265cc186e79cd5eb2fe... It also works on VMs.

replies(15): >>45661833 #>>45662183 #>>45662569 #>>45662628 #>>45662841 #>>45662895 #>>45663091 #>>45664508 #>>45665044 #>>45665086 #>>45665226 #>>45666389 #>>45666833 #>>45673327 #>>45677907 #
levkk ◴[21 Oct 25 21:51 UTC] No.45662183[source]▶
Yeah, no way. As soon as you hit swap, _most_ apps are going to have a bad, bad time. This is well known, so much so that all EC2 instances in AWS disable it by default. Sure, they want to sell you more RAM, but it's also just true that swap doesn't work for today's expectations.

Maybe back in the 90s, it was okay to wait 2-3 seconds for a button click, but today we just assume the thing is dead and reboot.

replies(16): >>45662314 #>>45662349 #>>45662398 #>>45662411 #>>45662419 #>>45662472 #>>45662588 #>>45663055 #>>45663460 #>>45664054 #>>45664170 #>>45664389 #>>45664461 #>>45666199 #>>45667250 #>>45668533 #
1. Dylan16807 ◴[22 Oct 25 02:57 UTC] No.45664461[source]▶
"as soon as you hit swap" is a bad way of looking at things. Looking around at some servers I run, most of them have .5-2GB of swap used despite a bunch of gigabytes of free memory. That data is never or almost never going to be touched, and keeping it in memory would be a waste. On a smaller server that can be a significant waste.

Swap is good to have. The value is limited but real.

Also not having swap doesn't prevent thrashing, it just means that as memory gets completely full you start dropping and re-reading executable code over and over. The solution is the same in both cases, kill programs before performance falls off a cliff. But swap gives you more room before you reach the cliff.