←back to thread

184 points mikhael | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.41s | source
Show context
kronodeus ◴[] No.45662412[source]
This article is written in a very annoying and misleading way. The discovery is not that rotation can be "reset". That is obvious and not surprising at all. Physical systems governed by classical mechanics are reversible just by perfectly inverting all forces, velocities, and rotations. The actual discovery is the shortcut to the original position without the need to perfectly inverse the full sequence of rotations.
replies(2): >>45662503 #>>45662910 #
1. clysm ◴[] No.45662503[source]
Kind of like… a “hidden reset”…
replies(1): >>45663431 #
2. kronodeus ◴[] No.45663431[source]
The title itself is not the problem, although even that is sensationalized. I was referring to the contents of the article, which have statements like this:

"Is there a way for you to spin the top again so it ends up in the exact position it started, as if you had never spun it at all? Surprisingly, yes..."

Which, as an introduction, just misses the mark completely by highlighting the least surprising possible interpretation of the research.