←back to thread

804 points jryio | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
Tiberium ◴[] No.45661779[source]
The situation is interesting, and self-hosting is indeed a very nice solution often. However, I wanted to comment on the article itself - it seems to be very heavily AI-edited. Anyone who has spent time with LLMs will easily see it. But even that's not the issue; the main issue is that the article is basically a marketing piece.

For example, the "Bridging the Gap: Why Not Just Docker Compose?" section is a 1:1 copy of the points in the "Powerful simplicity" on the landing page - https://disco.cloud/

And this blog post is the (only) case study that they showcase on their main page.

replies(6): >>45661836 #>>45661866 #>>45661928 #>>45662163 #>>45662200 #>>45663247 #
1. tasuki ◴[] No.45662200[source]
> But even that's not the issue; the main issue is that the article is basically a marketing piece.

Why is that an issue? Is it forbidden by HN guidelines? Or would you like all marketing to be marked as such? Which articles aren't marketing, one way or another?