←back to thread

404 points voxleone | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
reactordev ◴[] No.45655443[source]
Posture, no one can compete, not even NASA.
replies(2): >>45655530 #>>45655583 #
altcognito ◴[] No.45655583[source]
"Not even" only applies to those that haven't followed the events of the past decade.

1. USA is no longer sponsoring groundbreaking research 2. USA had already begun outsourcing research to companies that are not grounded in long term employment of researchers.

replies(1): >>45655841 #
inglor_cz ◴[] No.45655841[source]
In general, yes, but in this specific instance, groundbreaking research or its lack isn't the core of the problem.

This is mostly about the new human-rated lander, which is an engineering problem. Notably, the US never had a reasonably safe spaceship, although Dragon may yet prove good. Both Apollos and Space Shuttles, developed under NASA, were pretty dangerous to their crews.

replies(2): >>45656266 #>>45656635 #
1. altcognito ◴[] No.45656635{3}[source]
I debated exactly that before posting, I appreciate your comment.

I do think there are some novel challenges left for the Artemis project however that do require a lot of research and development before they are put before the boring engineering happens.