←back to thread

521 points hd4 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
muddi900[dead post] ◴[] No.45644484[source]
[flagged]
dotnet00 ◴[] No.45644917[source]
This is such a popular coping tactic from Americans when it comes to facing actual competition, especially from China. Everything they do must either be a lie or just stolen American technology, as if there's something inherently special about Americans that no one else has.
replies(4): >>45645295 #>>45645502 #>>45645534 #>>45646323 #
1. serf ◴[] No.45646323[source]
It's easy to guess that an opponent that is focusing on information control and theatre above all else is doing so for reasons.

> Everything they do must either be a lie or just stolen American technology

as an aviation enthusiast for 30+ years this claim , while deliberately blunt, is not far from the truth -- the truth being that half of their hardware was stolen Russian design, too.

Let's consider : The KJ-600, the J-31, J-10, H-6, Z-20, J-7, J-15, J-11.

If it isn't a direct shape-to-shape knockoff like the J-31 it's either a licensed reproduction from Russia or something derived from a reverse engineering effort like the Su-33 prototype they got from Ukraine. Similar story with their Ghost Bat knockoffs.

There are very few novel designs. I'm not faulting the methodology -- the shape of the thing w.r.t. aircraft is half (if not more) of the struggle.

It's a tremendous advantage to start from a known good shape and go from there. If I were the boss I would do exactly the same thing when trying to bootstrap an aerospace industry.

>as if there's something inherently special about Americans that no one else has.

the US has proven numerous times that this is exactly the case.