←back to thread

Space Elevator

(neal.fun)
1773 points kaonwarb | 1 comments | 20 Oct 25 04:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
isgb ◴[20 Oct 25 12:46 UTC] No.45643283[source]▶
> Space elevators are actually a possible idea being considered by scientists. > The hard part is making a strong enough cable. And finding enough elevator music...

Most engineers would bring up a lot more issues than just finding a strong cable. Also, most attempts with e.g. carbon nanotubes have been abandoned ages ago https://www.newscientist.com/article/2093356-carbon-nanotube....

- We don't have a good ascent mechanism other than rockets - and then we might just use rockets without building an elevator. - We don't have a good (and safe) descent mechanism. - Maintenance? Protection from space debris? Protection from oscillations? Ground-protection if the elevator collapses?

This is dyson-sphere level of fiction. We can do back-of-the-napkin calcualtions on how things would work, but the practicalities make it completely impossible or impractical.

replies(10): >>45643401 #>>45643468 #>>45643478 #>>45643508 #>>45643735 #>>45644414 #>>45644701 #>>45644865 #>>45644889 #>>45645166 #
seanc ◴[20 Oct 25 13:12 UTC] No.45643508[source]▶
Kim Stanley Robinson's description of a Martian space elevator falling and wrapping twice around the entire planet convinced me that they aren't a good idea.

https://www.kimstanleyrobinson.info/content/clarke

replies(3): >>45643883 #>>45644969 #>>45645609 #
enraged_camel ◴[20 Oct 25 13:47 UTC] No.45643883[source]▶
A version of this also happens in the first season of Foundation, the Apple TV series based on Asimov's novels.
replies(2): >>45644219 #>>45644502 #
1. gilbetron ◴[20 Oct 25 14:44 UTC] No.45644502[source]▶
The Mars one is much more interesting and traumatic :)