←back to thread

101 points kozmonaut | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
buyucu ◴[] No.45393947[source]
I just use libgen / Anna's Archive. No need to pay money to Amazon.
replies(3): >>45393995 #>>45394202 #>>45394692 #
ugjka ◴[] No.45393995[source]
So how exactly pirating the books give money to the writers?
replies(9): >>45394032 #>>45394039 #>>45394063 #>>45394070 #>>45394084 #>>45394095 #>>45394152 #>>45394437 #>>45394869 #
1. wltr ◴[] No.45394869[source]
I pirate all the books, I treat that as a public library. I don’t read most of them. The ones I have read and found good, I talk about them, write about them, and I can buy them. For myself, plus as gifts to others. I just dislike buying highly marketed book that turned out to be useless.

If I’ll ever to become an author myself, I don’t see any issue with that.

replies(1): >>45403164 #
2. rs186 ◴[] No.45403164[source]
I use the local public library from time to time (physical/via Libby) while reading on my kindle otherwise. Libby is something else, but for the physical books, I just see zero difference between going to the library in person, checking it out and returning it later vs just pirating it online. It's not like the publisher does not get any more money. OK there is a difference where there is a limit to the number of copies available, so some people have to wait, just typical of public resources. But I noticed that most books I borrow are always available, especially with interlibrary borrowing. So what difference does it make?

In the end I pirated more often. I am not proud of that, but I also don't see how any of this makes any difference. It's not like I'll ever buy the book with my own money.