←back to thread

525 points alex77456 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
randerson ◴[] No.45390198[source]
[flagged]
replies(8): >>45390306 #>>45390403 #>>45390465 #>>45390597 #>>45390614 #>>45390893 #>>45391713 #>>45392190 #
hnlmorg ◴[] No.45390597[source]
> Isn't a larger issue the number of immigrants who are NOT contributing to the economy,

The bigger issue is people not contributing to the economy. Let’s not peg laziness as an immigration problem because British people are equally lazy.

> The other complaint I often see is immigrants' failure to assimilate to British norms, language, and culture.

If we forced people to conform to British norms then we wouldn’t enjoy the variety of takeaways that Brits have enjoyed for decades. Which is ironic because a kebab is now considered a British norm for post drinking meals.

Plus it’s not as if British people are particularly good at integrating with other cultures. Most Brits can’t even speak a second language and don’t even attempt to learn the customs and language of any other countries they visit.

> People who complain about these things seem to often run into the UK's limitations on freedom of speech.

I think the opposite is the problem. People have been far too vocal about the mythical problems that immigrants bring and anyone who attempts to present actual facts gets shot down as “woke” or “leftard” etc.

We need to stop blaming other people for our own problems.

replies(2): >>45390768 #>>45391262 #
randerson ◴[] No.45391262[source]
Major difference between visiting a place and emigrating there. How many cultures actually learn another language just to go on their annual vacation? You seem to be arguing simultaneously that the Brits are worse than average when it comes to adapting to local norms as tourists, while also suggesting that the people moving to Britain permanently shouldn't have to?

There's nothing wrong with a culture adapting over time without losing their identity, like your example of Brits deciding to add the kebab. But a small country can't preserve their identity when they are overloaded by so many immigrants coming in at once who FORCE their ways on their new home. Think of it as Push vs Pull, there's a difference.

Every country having a unique culture makes the world more interesting. Imagine how boring it would be if you saved up for a trip to Japan/Kenya/Chile/etc, only to find that almost everyone there was a white English-speaking American living the exact same lifestyle you have at home? Leftists would in that case be empathetic toward the remaining indigenous minority who feel their historic way of life was killed off against their will. Why should it be any different if you swap the country and nationalities in this example to what is happening in the UK?

I am an immigrant myself, and a fairly liberal one at that. But I made the effort to come to my new home legally and assimilate to the best of my ability. I'm not sure why I should hold others to a lower standard.

replies(1): >>45391918 #
hnlmorg ◴[] No.45391918{3}[source]
> You seem to be arguing simultaneously that the Brits are worse than average when it comes to adapting to local norms as tourists, while also suggesting that the people moving to Britain permanently shouldn't have to?

No. I’m arguing that people who say “people change their personalities to suit mine” are hypocrites.

> But a small country can't preserve their identity when they are overloaded by so many immigrants coming in at once who FORCE their ways on their new home. Think of it as Push vs Pull, there's a difference.

Citation required — for literally every part of that sentence.

> Every country having a unique culture makes the world more interesting.

Exactly my point as well.

> Leftists would in that case be empathetic toward the remaining indigenous minority who feel their historic way of life was killed off against their will. Why should it be any different if you swap the country and nationalities in this example to what is happening in the UK?

If you think a fraction of a percentage of people coming to the UK is suddenly going to change the identity of the entire country then you need to get out and explore more of the UK yourself.

> I am an immigrant myself, and a fairly liberal one at that. But I made the effort to come to my new home legally and assimilate to the best of my ability. I'm not sure why I should hold others to a lower standard.

The problem isn’t the suggestion. The problem is the entitlement.

I do think it’s courteous for people to make an effort to integrate. But it should also be their decision, not ours.

And that’s the crux of the problem.

Most of the time, the complains about immigration are unfounded scapegoating of people who are different. It’s got fuck all to do with facts. It’s just people who the government have failed, or people who feel entitled, being fearful of other people who are different. It’s literally just an unchecked primal instinct. And we need to grow past that as a species.

replies(2): >>45392232 #>>45392348 #
1. 9x39 ◴[] No.45392232{4}[source]
>I do think it’s courteous for people to make an effort to integrate. But it should also be their decision, not ours.

If I choose not to integrate, and to instead practice particularly illiberal approaches to women, for example, is that still my decision? If my culture uses rape and acid to control women, may I continue?

I'm picking on a particularly onerous difference between Western and MENA peoples that's been a flashpoint in the UK, from what I can see.

If immigration was purely unfounded scapegoating, and we all could simply talk about our heritage and share new foods in these borderless economic zones that used to be countries, why would there be articles like these popping up:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/aug/05/disputed-or-...

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyvnnj301l3o

Another debate probably reduced to a single bit of information between participants. Class based analyses on immigration are probably more telling, but there doesn't seem to be much available.

replies(1): >>45393144 #
2. hnlmorg ◴[] No.45393144[source]
> If I choose not to integrate, and to instead practice particularly illiberal approaches to women, for example, is that still my decision? If my culture uses rape and acid to control women, may I continue?

You’re now conflating culture with crime.

And are you honestly suggesting that other cultures have literally nothing to offer asides violent sexual offences?!

Ridiculous.

> If immigration was purely unfounded scapegoating, and we all could simply talk about our heritage and share new foods in these borderless economic zones that used to be countries, why would there be articles like these popping up

The first article is debunking headline claims about immigration. Ostensibly supporting my claims.

The second article is just a commentary of the government’s plans to deport.

Neither of them defend your position.