←back to thread

238 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.45314757[source]
> An analysis published in 2020 by the Transport Research Laboratory, a British organisation, found that touchscreens impaired a driver’s reaction time more than driving over the legal alcohol limit.

The question isn't whether they're dangerous, anymore.

The question is, when is safety legislation going to be passed that prevents them from being used for any routine adjustments while driving. I.e. windshield wipers, AC, change volume, skip to next track, etc.

Like it's fine if you still use them to input a GPS destination, change long-term car settings, connect a Bluetooth device, etc.

But we need to separate out the actions routinely used during driving and legislate physical controls. Why is there not legislation for this already?

replies(11): >>45314916 #>>45314919 #>>45315029 #>>45315075 #>>45315182 #>>45316058 #>>45316286 #>>45316477 #>>45317954 #>>45318566 #>>45319312 #
1. hedora ◴[] No.45318566[source]
I would support legislation that requires routine controls to be safety tested, and further requires all functionality to behave the same regardless of vehicle velocity or whether it is in gear.

There could be a narrow carve out for the manual, and stuff like software updates that make the console reboot.

If you attempt to adjust the bass and treble on our kia when it is in gear, the fucking sliders are not only broken, but they randomly move around on the screen like a “I bet you can’t dismiss this dialogue” prank app.

On old bmws, you can set gps destinations using the jog wheel while the car is in motion.

On the new ones, that’s disabled, the voice control reads off legal disclaimers and aggressively times out, making you restart the flow if you dare pay attention to the road while driving.

On top of that the (enshittified) jog wheel is erratic if the car is in motion. How does this stuff pass safety tests?