←back to thread

238 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.45314757[source]
> An analysis published in 2020 by the Transport Research Laboratory, a British organisation, found that touchscreens impaired a driver’s reaction time more than driving over the legal alcohol limit.

The question isn't whether they're dangerous, anymore.

The question is, when is safety legislation going to be passed that prevents them from being used for any routine adjustments while driving. I.e. windshield wipers, AC, change volume, skip to next track, etc.

Like it's fine if you still use them to input a GPS destination, change long-term car settings, connect a Bluetooth device, etc.

But we need to separate out the actions routinely used during driving and legislate physical controls. Why is there not legislation for this already?

replies(11): >>45314916 #>>45314919 #>>45315029 #>>45315075 #>>45315182 #>>45316058 #>>45316286 #>>45316477 #>>45317954 #>>45318566 #>>45319312 #
lazystar ◴[] No.45315029[source]
> Why is there not legislation for this already?

Cars that dont kill their drivers are more likely to have repeat customers; i.e. other factors besides legislation will force car manufacterers to shift their designs back to this approach. My 2024 CRV has exactly what you describe.

replies(8): >>45315082 #>>45315133 #>>45315204 #>>45315265 #>>45315302 #>>45315343 #>>45315384 #>>45315689 #
1. derriz ◴[] No.45315204[source]
The other factors being that enough people get killed so that a shrinking market share forces their management decide to change their car designs?

I have a libertarian streak when it comes to drugs, porn/prostitution, free speech, patent law, etc. but in this case I’m perfectly fine with governments “getting involved” to ensure that I can shop for a vehicle without becoming a random sample in a statistical study of car safety. Especially if a possible outcome is my preventable death.