←back to thread

1245 points mriguy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rideontime ◴[] No.45308805[source]
Bit ridiculous that this article leaves as a footnote that this rule change is illegal and likely to be struck down by the first lawsuit.
replies(6): >>45308841 #>>45308854 #>>45308873 #>>45308999 #>>45309092 #>>45309490 #
LPisGood ◴[] No.45308841[source]
I think it is kind of a footnote. Many things this administration has done are illegal and struck down by the first lawsuit but later let stand by a friendly Supreme Court.
replies(2): >>45308913 #>>45308951 #
justinator ◴[] No.45308951[source]
And should be added, let stand by the Supreme Court without given a reasoning on why it stands. Just all shadow dockets.

Corruption by another name. The canary is already dead.

replies(2): >>45309264 #>>45310402 #
fastball ◴[] No.45309264{3}[source]
Can you give an example?
replies(1): >>45309344 #