←back to thread

Trump to impose $100k fee for H-1B worker visas, White House says

(www.reuters.com)
1245 points mriguy | 6 comments | 19 Sep 25 19:59 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
rideontime ◴[20 Sep 25 01:10 UTC] No.45308805[source]▶
Bit ridiculous that this article leaves as a footnote that this rule change is illegal and likely to be struck down by the first lawsuit.
replies(6): >>45308841 #>>45308854 #>>45308873 #>>45308999 #>>45309092 #>>45309490 #
1. LPisGood ◴[20 Sep 25 01:13 UTC] No.45308841[source]▶
I think it is kind of a footnote. Many things this administration has done are illegal and struck down by the first lawsuit but later let stand by a friendly Supreme Court.
replies(2): >>45308913 #>>45308951 #
2. softwaredoug ◴[20 Sep 25 01:19 UTC] No.45308913[source]▶
That's true on administrative state issues (Trump being allowed to fire people in the exec. branch). It's not clear this is a 100% guarantee for everything beyond that. (Maybe a 65% guarantee).
3. justinator ◴[20 Sep 25 01:24 UTC] No.45308951[source]▶
And should be added, let stand by the Supreme Court without given a reasoning on why it stands. Just all shadow dockets.

Corruption by another name. The canary is already dead.

replies(2): >>45309264 #>>45310402 #
4. fastball ◴[20 Sep 25 01:47 UTC] No.45309264[source]▶
Can you give an example?
replies(1): >>45309344 #
5. justinator ◴[20 Sep 25 01:54 UTC] No.45309344{3}[source]▶
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/emergency/emergency-do...
6. twothreeone ◴[20 Sep 25 04:33 UTC] No.45310402[source]▶
How is a president winning the election and then packing the SC corruption? It's not like people didn't have a choice, they did vote for the guy. Twice!