←back to thread

1233 points mriguy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.273s | source
Show context
cogman10 ◴[] No.45306123[source]
IMO, the fee is the wrong thing that needs adjusting. It's the salary that should be adjusted. The minimum salary for an H1B should be $200k. It's something like 50k right now which is ridiculous especially with all the restrictions an applicant is under. It both suppresses wages and abuses the worker.
replies(11): >>45306145 #>>45306221 #>>45306228 #>>45306250 #>>45306297 #>>45306340 #>>45306493 #>>45306620 #>>45306997 #>>45307107 #>>45309827 #
ericmcer ◴[] No.45306297[source]
Is it too complex to just look at the companies taxes and be like... "Hey you are paying H1B workers 25% less than their peers. You get hit with a fine".

If you couldn't undercut H1B salaries there is little incentive to use them except for their desired purpose (you can't find any local workers).

replies(3): >>45306350 #>>45306496 #>>45312485 #
OkayPhysicist ◴[] No.45306350[source]
Even paid identically, a company might prefer H1Bs for retention purposes. Having an indentured serf who's difficult for other companies to hire and is at constant risk of deportation if they lose their job is a winning prospect for the worst companies.
replies(2): >>45306456 #>>45307307 #
1. DragonStrength ◴[] No.45307307[source]
As my manager at Amazon once told me, “Amazon prefers H1Bs because they take more abuse.”