←back to thread

KDE is now my favorite desktop

(kokada.dev)
892 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | 18 Sep 25 12:17 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
christophilus ◴[18 Sep 25 13:23 UTC] No.45289397[source]▶
I just find it ugly vs Gnome or Mac. Inconsistent padding, font sizes, colors. Admittedly, this was maybe 5 years ago. Has that improved?

These days, I daily drive Niri and love it. I love the workflow of a scrolling WM. I love that I can configure it via a single text file in the standard configuration directory, I love how lightweight it is. It’s just about perfect for me.

replies(13): >>45289419 #>>45289430 #>>45289490 #>>45289539 #>>45289557 #>>45289563 #>>45289635 #>>45289660 #>>45289913 #>>45290028 #>>45290403 #>>45291741 #>>45305167 #
dmd ◴[18 Sep 25 13:26 UTC] No.45289419[source]▶
> Inconsistent padding, font sizes, colors.

But enough about Mac OS Tahoe!

replies(1): >>45289528 #
carlosjobim ◴[18 Sep 25 13:35 UTC] No.45289528[source]▶
Gnome has been the best looking desktop for about 5 years now, with OS X in second place. KDE and Windows (after 7) are so far below that they're a category of their own.

Apple should at once hire the people who are responsible for Gnome's UI, because they've got it figured out. Even better, put back together the Nokia N9 GUI team.

replies(7): >>45289587 #>>45289589 #>>45289704 #>>45289821 #>>45289845 #>>45294556 #>>45295626 #
cosmic_cheese ◴[18 Sep 25 14:01 UTC] No.45289821[source]▶
GNOME is pretty, but it’s not great when it comes to progressive disclosure – what you see is what you get; there’s no depth in which power user features can be found.

macOS is nearly the opposite in this regard. I wouldn’t mind giving it a facelift but doing it GNOME style would mean it losing much of what has kept many users on it.

replies(2): >>45290547 #>>45290597 #
WD-42 ◴[18 Sep 25 15:05 UTC] No.45290597[source]▶
Do you have any examples where power features aren't accessible? The OP used a wifi applet as an example of exposing information. I'm not sure if this isn't as common as I think it is - but what's wrong with typing `ip` into a terminal (that's always open anyway)? It's desktop agnostic, works even without a desktop. And then there's no need for an entire applet dedicated just to wifi for the rare occasion you need to lookup your MAC address.
replies(3): >>45290813 #>>45291277 #>>45295570 #
demurgos ◴[18 Sep 25 16:00 UTC] No.45291277{3}[source]▶
> I'm not sure if this isn't as common as I think it is - but what's wrong with typing `ip` into a terminal (that's always open anyway)?

I'm a regular Linux user, but I wouldn't know how to get all the data from the Wi-Fi applet using the Command Line. GUI have the advantage of discoverability over CLI: with a GUI I get a bunch of useful info in a single place, with a CLI I first need to know that a data is available and then I need to look-up the right invocation to get this data.

replies(1): >>45291559 #
1. cosmic_cheese ◴[18 Sep 25 16:22 UTC] No.45291559{4}[source]▶
UI also represents an opportunity for standardization, which is a powerful force for onboarding non-technical users and in time, turning them into power users. Standardized patterns illustrate to users that there's a method to the madness and that computers are finite, learnable systems and not seemingly arbitrary chaos or unintelligible techno-wizardry.