←back to thread

892 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.43s | source
Show context
christophilus ◴[] No.45289397[source]
I just find it ugly vs Gnome or Mac. Inconsistent padding, font sizes, colors. Admittedly, this was maybe 5 years ago. Has that improved?

These days, I daily drive Niri and love it. I love the workflow of a scrolling WM. I love that I can configure it via a single text file in the standard configuration directory, I love how lightweight it is. It’s just about perfect for me.

replies(13): >>45289419 #>>45289430 #>>45289490 #>>45289539 #>>45289557 #>>45289563 #>>45289635 #>>45289660 #>>45289913 #>>45290028 #>>45290403 #>>45291741 #>>45305167 #
FirmwareBurner ◴[] No.45289539[source]
>I just find it ugly vs Gnome or Mac. Inconsistent padding, font sizes, colors.

IDK mate, I care more about the utility than the looks since I spend my time using the DE, not hanging it on my wall to admire its artistic attention to detail.

Like I'm sure those inconsistencies exist, but am I the only one whose brain just filters them out like they just don't exist? Kind of like how your brain filters out your nose from your eyesight and you only become aware of it when you look for it.

And to me and my use case and formed habits, utility wise KDE >>> Gnome by a wide margin, though KDE still has some annoyances I wish they would tackle, but for a free product, I can't complain.

replies(5): >>45289643 #>>45289650 #>>45289876 #>>45290072 #>>45290376 #
1. squigz ◴[] No.45290072[source]
Poor design can and does impact usability for a lot of users. If you care about the utility, you should care about e.g. wasted screen space with extraneous padding.
replies(1): >>45290669 #
2. FirmwareBurner ◴[] No.45290669[source]
>you should care about e.g. wasted screen space with extraneous padding.

Where KDE is better than Gnome whose UI looks like its was designed for tablet use or 4K+ displays. So yeah, on that front I do care, which is why I prefer KDE.