←back to thread

1332 points Qem | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
therobots927 ◴[] No.45266704[source]
I for one will be holding my representatives responsible who continue to vote for the US to enable a genocide. The videos coming out of Gaza have turned me and many others into single issue voters.
replies(16): >>45267088 #>>45267542 #>>45267847 #>>45268465 #>>45268480 #>>45268633 #>>45268878 #>>45269034 #>>45269263 #>>45269527 #>>45269796 #>>45270181 #>>45270992 #>>45274127 #>>45275351 #>>45276704 #
mandeepj ◴[] No.45268633[source]
> The videos coming out of Gaza have turned me and many others into single issue voters.

Ironically, that was one of the biggest campaign points and voter sentiment on which people flipped to Red. We all know what happened.

replies(4): >>45268800 #>>45269586 #>>45269628 #>>45281328 #
GoatInGrey ◴[] No.45268800[source]
People didn't flip to red so much as blue voters in swing states sitting on their hands and abstaining from voting. Now they're looking down the barrel of authoritarianism and they're still unwilling to vote unless Gaza is a fully solved problem. The cruel irony is that this behavior is worsening the situation in Gaza.
replies(7): >>45268897 #>>45268995 #>>45269124 #>>45269706 #>>45269861 #>>45270677 #>>45270852 #
roenxi ◴[] No.45268995[source]
If only the blue representatives would resolve this tension by pulling support for a now internationally-recognised genocide! :( I suppose that option is just too radical to put on the table.
replies(3): >>45269410 #>>45269432 #>>45269451 #
1. hypeatei ◴[] No.45269410{4}[source]
You've thought through the full foreign policy implications for pulling aid from Israel overnight? I'm not sure why "less bad" on your pet issue isn't enough, especially when you're up against Trump, who has made posts suggesting resorts and golden statues of himself in Gaza.
replies(3): >>45269487 #>>45270967 #>>45273071 #
2. mandeepj ◴[] No.45269487[source]
> You've thought through the full foreign policy implications for pulling aid from Israel overnight?

I don’t think many people are thinking through now especially the one at the top of power chain, otherwise we’d not have witnessed child charades like invade Canada, Greenland, and Panama, as well as overnight gutting of USAID.

3. vasco ◴[] No.45270967[source]
What are the implications? Israel isn't going to align with Russia or China, so probably they'll have to stand on their own and rely more on their nuclear deterrent. It'd be easier if they weren't bombing every single neighbor they have though.
replies(3): >>45271201 #>>45271233 #>>45271243 #
4. throwaway3060 ◴[] No.45271201[source]
Russia and China would love to get their hands on Israeli tech. Nothing happens in a vacuum.
5. nebula8804 ◴[] No.45271233[source]
Actually I think thats exactly the plan. They will milk the US as long as they can and once they have gotten everything they can from that dead corpse, they will do what any other nation would do: Align themselves with whatever partner that can help them the most. They have a lot of talent and investment (thanks to the US) and can offer other future superpowers plenty in exchange for partnerships.
replies(1): >>45274428 #
6. klipt ◴[] No.45271243[source]
> bombing every single neighbor they have

The neighbors who signed peace treaties (Egypt, Jordan) seem to be maintaining peace fine.

It's the ones who've refused to normalize relations since 1949 and keep launching rockets over the border at civilians who get hit back.

replies(1): >>45279033 #
7. roenxi ◴[] No.45273071[source]
I doubt any foreign policy aid would get pulled from Israel. Israel doesn't need to be taking actions perceived as genocidal. If the US wasn't offering full and unconditional support they'd just have to go about their foreign policy aims in a more palatable way.

Isreal's approach to foreign policy doesn't do them any favours, I've lost count of the number of negotiators they've taken out this year. The US would be helping them by forcing them to conform a bit more to global norms, if they upset less people and try some more cooperative strategies we might see progress on peace in the region. The fact that the Democrats failed to find a frame like that to prevent what appears, superficially, to be a genocide really goes to the heart of what GoatInGrey was pointing at.

8. vasco ◴[] No.45274428{3}[source]
Yeah I was just curious what the commenter thought because to me it's not obvious what would happen, there's many possibilities, what you listed is certainly plausible but it doesn't seem inevitable, depends on so much.
9. LorenPechtel ◴[] No.45279033{3}[source]
Exactly. Israel isn't exactly the nicest country but they're a porcupine. You leave them alone, they leave you alone. You keep poking them, you get hammered.

And, yes, the settlers are not a good thing--but the problem exists because the government knows they are not the actual cause of the problem, Israel would gain nothing from curtailing them. And note that the violence is wildly misreported, much of it is defensive in nature (look at how often you see one person get shot who is facing the settlers when supposedly they were fleeing--awfully hard to shoot a fleeing person in the front) and plenty of it is purely fake.