←back to thread

Hosting a website on a disposable vape

(bogdanthegeek.github.io)
1386 points BogdanTheGeek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
x187463 ◴[] No.45249934[source]
Re-using this sort of device is super cool. I can imagine a post-apocalyptic scenario where a city is run on a hodgepodge of random computing devices like this.

I will say, though, disposable vapes with microcontrollers inside (and even full games and screens from recent reporting) are an egregious source of e-waste. Many layers of stupid are present here.

replies(11): >>45250057 #>>45250161 #>>45250275 #>>45250310 #>>45250322 #>>45250541 #>>45250673 #>>45251121 #>>45252055 #>>45252398 #>>45254937 #
beAbU ◴[] No.45250161[source]
I've been aware about the perfectly reusable lithium batteries inside these disposable vapes, which is egregious enough.

But the one in the FTA comes with a full fat microcontroller and USB-C connector! I'm not clear if these connectors are accessible outside or if you need to break open the packaging before being able to get to it.

Like you said: "Many layers of stupid are present here"

All that hardware must surely be worth more than half the value of the actual product!

replies(3): >>45250261 #>>45251974 #>>45252159 #
rglullis ◴[] No.45250261[source]
Between (a) component that costs tens of cents to mass produce and can be bought off the shelf and is reusable vs (b) component that needs actual experienced electronics engineers working on a single-use design that can not be repurposed later, I think we'd see that (a) might end up being less wasteful.
replies(2): >>45250612 #>>45250667 #
afiori ◴[] No.45250612[source]
> can not be repurposed later

whether it can be repurposed is worth little in being wasteful if >99% go to the landfill.

> I think we'd see that (a) might end up being less wasteful.

Monetarily? sure. Environmentally? unlikely

replies(2): >>45250948 #>>45252185 #
rglullis ◴[] No.45252185[source]
Environmentally, there is very little difference at the landfill if the PCB has an 8 bit microcontroller or a 64 bit ARM chip.

The only environment-friendly solution is to forbid this product to exist in the first place.

replies(1): >>45252476 #
carelyair ◴[] No.45252476[source]
Exactly. Why not just sell a reusable vape that can be filled with the extract you want?
replies(3): >>45254398 #>>45256399 #>>45256462 #
genewitch ◴[] No.45254398{3}[source]
if this is a serious question:

it's because politicians bend to pressure from lobbyists and outcry, such that the very idea that a resuable vape means that children can vape pina colada flavored liquids.

There was a federal push during Trump v1 to only allow iqos devices in any stores. The two vape brands (maybe 3) allowed in general in my state are manufactured by... if you guessed RJR and PMI, you are correct. The big tobacco farmers and cig manufacturers.

Reusable vapes with custom or pre-mixed flavors were attacked hard. I still have a couple liters of 100mg/ml nicotine in my freezer, for making custom flavors at home. I don't even know if you can still order nicotine in that ratio anymore in the US.

replies(1): >>45256388 #
1. ◴[] No.45256388{4}[source]