←back to thread

Hosting a website on a disposable vape

(bogdanthegeek.github.io)
1386 points BogdanTheGeek | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
x187463 ◴[] No.45249934[source]
Re-using this sort of device is super cool. I can imagine a post-apocalyptic scenario where a city is run on a hodgepodge of random computing devices like this.

I will say, though, disposable vapes with microcontrollers inside (and even full games and screens from recent reporting) are an egregious source of e-waste. Many layers of stupid are present here.

replies(11): >>45250057 #>>45250161 #>>45250275 #>>45250310 #>>45250322 #>>45250541 #>>45250673 #>>45251121 #>>45252055 #>>45252398 #>>45254937 #
palata ◴[] No.45250673[source]
The fact that selling such a thing is profitable means that we lack regulations somewhere.
replies(5): >>45250978 #>>45251128 #>>45251642 #>>45256103 #>>45259163 #
ramesh31 ◴[] No.45250978[source]
>The fact that selling such a thing is profitable means that we lack regulations somewhere.

It's the exact opposite. Tobacco is so heavily regulated and taxed that these become profitable. If cigarettes were 3-4$ a pack (which they would be without sin taxes and regulatory overhead), the vape market would come down as well and there's no way these could be profitable. As it is, they retail around $20 and contain the same nicotine as multiple $10 packs of cigarettes.

replies(5): >>45251531 #>>45252038 #>>45252132 #>>45252383 #>>45253796 #
rixed ◴[] No.45253796[source]
Cigarettes could sell at 3-4$ a pack only because some regulation are in place that enforce the total separation of manufacturing and selling those packs from paying the cost for the societal damages wrt. health, pollution, littering...

There are many possible ways to slice the economical cake.

replies(1): >>45254973 #
1. ShroudedNight ◴[] No.45254973[source]
I'm not sure what your point is here.

1) They don't sell for $3-4 a pack, yet your post seems to imply that the system has failed for cigarettes.

2) For externalities beyond the input cost of a product, the default [natural] condition is for those costs not to be included - one needn't enforce anything. Rather, it requires that someone with power put their thumb on the scale to enforce the inclusion of those costs during a sale[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigouvian_tax

replies(1): >>45261618 #
2. rixed ◴[] No.45261618[source]
Sorry it was unclear, I was replying specifically to:

> If cigarettes were 3-4$ a pack (which they would be without sin taxes and regulatory overhead),

Trying to show that 3-4$ a pack is not a more "natural" price for cigarettes than the current one, that it is a matter of perspective, and that if one wanted to construct such a natural price all externalities would have to be taken into account.