←back to thread

1120 points xyzal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
timpera ◴[] No.45209388[source]
It's not the end of the fight, but it's great to see that the efforts are working! I sent a handwritten letter to my MPs a few weeks ago about this issue but no answer so far...
replies(5): >>45209452 #>>45210192 #>>45210261 #>>45210320 #>>45210420 #
riedel ◴[] No.45209452[source]
They oppose breaking encryption, however, I see no true opposition to on device scanning, which is a bit worrying.

>The BMI representative explained that they could not fully support the Danish position. They were, for example, opposed to breaking the encryption. The goal was to develop a unified compromise proposal – also to prevent the interim regulation from expiring. [0]

Edit: source [0] https://www.bundestag.de/presse/hib/kurzmeldungen-1108356

replies(2): >>45209587 #>>45209823 #
silverliver ◴[] No.45209823[source]
There is no on-device scanning without compromising privacy. Scanning that can detect child abuse can also detect human rights activists, investigative journalists, and so on. I imagine this technology can be easily used by the government to identify journalists by scanning for material related to their investigation.

On-device scanning is a fabrication that Apple foolishly introduced to the mainstream, and one that rabid politicians bit into and refuse to let go.

replies(2): >>45209910 #>>45210067 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45209910[source]
Some say "Apple got too much shit for on device scanning". I think they didn't get nearly enough.

If you as much as give the "think of the children" crowd an inch, they'll take a mile. And giving them on device scanning was way more than "an inch".

replies(1): >>45210076 #
1. immibis ◴[] No.45210076{3}[source]
Apple has never supported your privacy though, not really. Spyware company issues spyware, news at 11. They're better than Google, but they're not good.