←back to thread

Apple Watch Ultra 3

(www.apple.com)
76 points surprisetalk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
hu3 ◴[] No.45185712[source]
Why can't Apple, of all manufacturers, produce a watch that can last longer on a charge than one or two days?

Garmins easily last a week.

replies(16): >>45185730 #>>45185745 #>>45185751 #>>45185779 #>>45185842 #>>45185916 #>>45185925 #>>45185948 #>>45185975 #>>45186006 #>>45186069 #>>45186088 #>>45187025 #>>45188003 #>>45190868 #>>45193079 #
onlyrealcuzzo ◴[] No.45185751[source]
Why can't Apple produce a watch that you don't have to use with an iPhone?

There's not a shot in hell I'm ever switching from Android to iOS. People rarely do this.

Theoretically, I might buy an Apple Watch or Air Pods or Apple TV if they didn't go out of their way to make them either impossible to use without an iPhone or a living nightmare.

replies(3): >>45185891 #>>45185957 #>>45186014 #
johnbellone ◴[] No.45185891[source]
Why would you want an Apple Watch without an iPhone?

Most of the benefits are because the ecosystem is tightly integrated. I expect that there isn't a large enough market and it so happens to lock people into their other products. I haven't tried using my Air Pods on an Android phone, but they work perfectly fine on my Steam Deck (Linux).

replies(1): >>45186061 #
onlyrealcuzzo ◴[] No.45186061[source]
> Why would you want an Apple Watch without an iPhone?

Same reason I have a MacBook without an iPhone.

replies(1): >>45186199 #
lostlogin ◴[] No.45186199[source]
Here is how I’d convert you: Open your phone copy some text, open your MacBook, paste that text.

I don’t don’t do it a lot, but it’s the best.

replies(2): >>45187355 #>>45190137 #
1. buu700 ◴[] No.45190137[source]
I discovered that feature by accident while doing some testing with an iOS device, and found it concerning. IIRC it wasn't too difficult to disable, but it really should be opt-in.