←back to thread

Apple Watch Ultra 3

(www.apple.com)
76 points surprisetalk | 1 comments | 09 Sep 25 17:32 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hu3 ◴[09 Sep 25 17:55 UTC] No.45185712[source]▶
Why can't Apple, of all manufacturers, produce a watch that can last longer on a charge than one or two days?

Garmins easily last a week.

replies(16): >>45185730 #>>45185745 #>>45185751 #>>45185779 #>>45185842 #>>45185916 #>>45185925 #>>45185948 #>>45185975 #>>45186006 #>>45186069 #>>45186088 #>>45187025 #>>45188003 #>>45190868 #>>45193079 #
1. mikestew ◴[09 Sep 25 19:02 UTC] No.45187025[source]▶
I’m content to charge every day, but I need the thing to be guaranteed to last the length of a slow mountain 50 miler. Remember the intro of the original Ultra, with Scott Jurek? You know Jurek, won Western States 100 (et al.) a few times? Yeah, well, us mortals sometimes need 12 hours to finish a 50 mile race with lots of elevation or desert heat (or both), and my experience says that I’m not guaranteed to get 12 hours of GPS activity tracking out of the thing without turning down GPS/HR frequency.

I love my Ultra, but for big running I had to go back to Garmin. I can leave the house with it half charged and still get a good 12 hours of running out of it before it dies.

OTOH, I’ve also had a Garmin 945TLE, with a cell radio in it. Fire up that cell radio, and goodbye battery life. I’ll be curious to see how that new Fenix does in the real world with its LTE radio blazing away.