(lucumr.pocoo.org)

1002 points genericlemon24 | 1 comments | 06 Sep 25 13:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Show context

didip ◴[06 Sep 25 14:13 UTC] No.45149420[source]▶

>>45149049 (OP) #

996 as an employee, especially for companies that don’t offer fast growing stocks, is a super bad deal.

996 for a business owner or top exec at a big company? It’s the norm. And the risk-reward makes sense to them.

replies(3): >>45149440 #>>45149568 #>>45149607 #

Kapura[dead post] ◴[06 Sep 25 14:16 UTC] No.45149440[source]▶

>>45149420 #

[flagged]

1. ponector ◴[06 Sep 25 19:05 UTC] No.45151995[source]▶

>>45149440 #

Are they making more dog shit decisions than average Joe? Magnitude of the decisions are bigger, of course.

Also what is the bad decision for CEO? To lay off 25% of stuff to boost quarterly profits, boost stock price is not a bad decision if you are a shareholder...

↑