←back to thread

280 points RyanShook | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dreamcompiler ◴[] No.45144685[source]
"Dumb" home devices work as expected for 25-50 years, and then you replace them.

"Smart" home devices work as expected for about a year and then they fail in new and exciting ways, and then you replace them.

replies(8): >>45144962 #>>45144973 #>>45144993 #>>45145082 #>>45145232 #>>45145349 #>>45145802 #>>45146174 #
slg ◴[] No.45144993[source]
While I agree with the message, I think honesty is important. The Nest gen 3 was released in 2015[1]. People got a 10-14 years out of these devices.

Also, that posts says the thermostat will still work locally so the failure state of the "smart" device here is that it became a "dumb" device after a decade+.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Nest#Nest_Learning_Ther...

replies(9): >>45145016 #>>45145426 #>>45145510 #>>45145547 #>>45145565 #>>45145916 #>>45146075 #>>45146337 #>>45146651 #
1. kiney ◴[] No.45146075[source]
in what world is a mere 10-14 years anywhere nesr acceptable? Mx parents home that was bzild in the 80s still has the original thermostats and I expect they will not replace them in theor lifetime. And this is not an exception, its the rule and should stay like that
replies(1): >>45146420 #
2. davidcbc ◴[] No.45146420[source]
How much functionality does that original thermostat have?
replies(2): >>45146589 #>>45146682 #
3. x0x0 ◴[] No.45146589[source]
Now do how much they cost compared to the $250 + tax Nest charged.
4. bornfreddy ◴[] No.45146682[source]
Soon, the same (or more?) than 1sr/2nd gen Nests.