←back to thread

275 points starkparker | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dankwizard ◴[] No.45133610[source]
Ha, this is the guy that got absolutely butchered in his Reddit post [1] about the same link. OP has extensive history in the piracy subreddits and believes piracy is not theft.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1n87xho/why_i_d...

replies(9): >>45133703 #>>45133713 #>>45134587 #>>45134595 #>>45134596 #>>45134696 #>>45135311 #>>45136361 #>>45141992 #
BLKNSLVR ◴[] No.45133703[source]
> believes piracy is not theft

That's true by definition isn't it? Piracy (Internet piracy, since that's the context) is copyright infringement, not theft.

replies(4): >>45133731 #>>45135356 #>>45136096 #>>45136423 #
b3lvedere ◴[] No.45135356[source]
To the letter of the law or contextual text, you may be super right. Still does not solve the issue of artists that are getting ripped off left and right.
replies(1): >>45135819 #
1. globular-toast ◴[] No.45135819[source]
Do you pay every busker you pass by? Or do you block your ears when you pass to ensure you don't "steal" the music?

I think a combination of UBI, abolishment of copyright and a busking model with 100% of the proceeds going directly to artists would improve things no end. We have the technology to do this and have no need for leeches like Spotify.

replies(1): >>45137996 #
2. b3lvedere ◴[] No.45137996[source]
There is a great difference in consuming art because you want to and consuming art because it was forced on to your senses.