←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
thor-rodrigues ◴[] No.45129033[source]
I’m not sure whether I find it more worrisome or fascinating that we live in a world where a company that, as far as I know, has never generated a single dollar in revenue has managed to exist for over five years, employ more than 100 people, and still get acquired for this amount.

This isn’t criticism or sarcasm — I’m genuinely impressed, but also very curious about the rationale behind it.

replies(8): >>45129122 #>>45129136 #>>45129191 #>>45129368 #>>45129806 #>>45129941 #>>45130950 #>>45135807 #
trhway ◴[] No.45130950[source]
less than a $6M/head - it is a steal. Not even counting whatever IP they have.
replies(1): >>45131051 #
rafram ◴[] No.45131051[source]
How much do you think it costs to hire people?
replies(1): >>45131377 #
trhway ◴[] No.45131377[source]
you think Mark didn't know it when he hired that guy for $250 millions? Anyway, you probably mean an individual hiring cost. Which is a totally different case from hiring and building a multifunctional team of 100. Look around at aqui-hires to understand the price, especially when we're talking about people who has been working with AI products.
replies(1): >>45132569 #
1. rafram ◴[] No.45132569[source]
$250 million was for a top researcher with more experience than almost anyone else in designing and training massive models.

As far as I know, Dia just calls OpenAI’s API. I’m sure their employees know a lot about using AI at this point, but so does everyone else who’s built an OpenAI wrapper.