←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.836s | source
Show context
thor-rodrigues ◴[] No.45129033[source]
I’m not sure whether I find it more worrisome or fascinating that we live in a world where a company that, as far as I know, has never generated a single dollar in revenue has managed to exist for over five years, employ more than 100 people, and still get acquired for this amount.

This isn’t criticism or sarcasm — I’m genuinely impressed, but also very curious about the rationale behind it.

replies(8): >>45129122 #>>45129136 #>>45129191 #>>45129368 #>>45129806 #>>45129941 #>>45130950 #>>45135807 #
colelyman ◴[] No.45129191[source]
Agreed, to make it even more interesting Browser Company discontinued Arc earlier this year. So not only did they do all of the things OP listed, but also didn't have a current product when acquired.
replies(5): >>45129257 #>>45130146 #>>45130571 #>>45130830 #>>45131560 #
emoII ◴[] No.45129257[source]
Where can I read about this? It still gets regular updates and is front and center on the browser company website
replies(2): >>45129292 #>>45129300 #
sphars ◴[] No.45129292[source]
This was their blog post back in May

https://browsercompany.substack.com/p/letter-to-arc-members-...

replies(1): >>45130637 #
swores ◴[] No.45130637[source]
Ironic that I wasn't familiar with this company or their products before today, and having read about both Arc and Dia, including reading this blog post you've linked, the product that makes me want to try it is the one they've stopped developing...
replies(2): >>45131158 #>>45131173 #
1. nofriend ◴[] No.45131173[source]
It was popular but had no real route to profitability. Hence the acquisition.