←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
thor-rodrigues ◴[] No.45129033[source]
I’m not sure whether I find it more worrisome or fascinating that we live in a world where a company that, as far as I know, has never generated a single dollar in revenue has managed to exist for over five years, employ more than 100 people, and still get acquired for this amount.

This isn’t criticism or sarcasm — I’m genuinely impressed, but also very curious about the rationale behind it.

replies(8): >>45129122 #>>45129136 #>>45129191 #>>45129368 #>>45129806 #>>45129941 #>>45130950 #>>45135807 #
darth_avocado ◴[] No.45129368[source]
There are some businesses that are simply not viable without losing money first. SpaceX cannot generate revenue until it first employs hundreds of people for a few years (maybe a decade) where they focus on building what will eventually bring revenue. Software has those problems too.
replies(5): >>45129468 #>>45129608 #>>45129686 #>>45129903 #>>45131261 #
anon191928 ◴[] No.45129608[source]
yeah and what makes them different compared to half baked fraud startups with no revenue ? most of the world would not believe that they will bring revenue in years?
replies(2): >>45130395 #>>45130420 #
1. darth_avocado ◴[] No.45130420[source]
That’s like the point of venture capitalism and to a certain extent all entrepreneurial endeavors. You could start a T-shirt printing company (a completely viable business) and not see any revenue come in for months.