←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
thor-rodrigues ◴[] No.45129033[source]
I’m not sure whether I find it more worrisome or fascinating that we live in a world where a company that, as far as I know, has never generated a single dollar in revenue has managed to exist for over five years, employ more than 100 people, and still get acquired for this amount.

This isn’t criticism or sarcasm — I’m genuinely impressed, but also very curious about the rationale behind it.

replies(8): >>45129122 #>>45129136 #>>45129191 #>>45129368 #>>45129806 #>>45129941 #>>45130950 #>>45135807 #
darth_avocado ◴[] No.45129368[source]
There are some businesses that are simply not viable without losing money first. SpaceX cannot generate revenue until it first employs hundreds of people for a few years (maybe a decade) where they focus on building what will eventually bring revenue. Software has those problems too.
replies(5): >>45129468 #>>45129608 #>>45129686 #>>45129903 #>>45131261 #
turnsout ◴[] No.45129468[source]
I mean this with no snark: I would love to see the investor deck that explains how an AI-powered browser is going to make any multiple of $610M.
replies(4): >>45129635 #>>45129684 #>>45130180 #>>45130776 #
immibis ◴[] No.45129684[source]
More charitably by selling the only browser that's actually usable in a few years. The AI will be used to cancel out the effect of other people's AI.
replies(4): >>45129843 #>>45129972 #>>45130369 #>>45130431 #
1. turnsout ◴[] No.45129843{3}[source]
Ha, that's a dark timeline! But sadly quite probable.