←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source | bottom
1. arnvald ◴[] No.45126784[source]
I really appreciate that there's a company trying to reimagine browsers. Arc was an interesting idea, I used it for a few months, but in the end I switched back to Firefox. I haven't tried Dia yet, and now I'm not sure if I should.

I do think that selling a browser is going to be an extremely difficult task, so having an enterprise software machine with huge customer base might help it, but Atlassian strikes me as a company that will eventually just kill the project and turn this into a de facto acquihire.

replies(4): >>45126822 #>>45127308 #>>45135741 #>>45136250 #
2. Cu3PO42 ◴[] No.45126822[source]
If you liked Arc, you should try Zen. I understand it brings many of the same ideas to a Firefox base.
replies(3): >>45126957 #>>45127354 #>>45128286 #
3. 4ggr0 ◴[] No.45126957[source]
+1, i used firefox since my childhood, never interested by Arc because it's idiotic to me that a browser requires an account. a while back someone suggested Zen, i now use it as my main browser since a bit over a month. really happy :)
4. sniffers ◴[] No.45127308[source]
Skip Dia, it's a security nightmare.
5. ◴[] No.45127354[source]
6. arnvald ◴[] No.45128286[source]
Thanks for recommendation, I'll give it a try
7. blackqueeriroh ◴[] No.45135741[source]
Atlassian doesn’t kill the products of companies they acquire
8. conradfr ◴[] No.45136250[source]
I never tried it because I was on Windows at the time but I remember my brother raving about it constantly, that I had to try it etc (and reading other people saying the same thing).

I think he's still using it. He probably would have paid something for it.

But then overnight they just weren't interested on building it. So strange.

replies(1): >>45138294 #
9. ljbred08 ◴[] No.45138294[source]
Right! So many people would have actually paid for Arc to keep active development going, but without even giving that option they switched to Dia...