←back to thread

We're Joining OpenAI

(www.alexcodes.app)
192 points liurenju | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
CyberMacGyver ◴[] No.45120228[source]
At this rate it’s better to start a company and get aquihired vs applying and getting hired.

Seems like OpenAI speed ran through the Facebook phase and are out of ideas

replies(5): >>45120368 #>>45120639 #>>45123216 #>>45124631 #>>45125345 #
kridsdale3 ◴[] No.45120368[source]
Au contraire, based on their recent hires, they're just beginning their Facebook phase. Expect to see a lot of ads 2 years from now, and expect to see a LOT of money being made by the company a year after that.

If they can maintain runway until then.

replies(13): >>45120439 #>>45120462 #>>45120737 #>>45120923 #>>45121451 #>>45123833 #>>45124176 #>>45124207 #>>45124568 #>>45125196 #>>45127156 #>>45128868 #>>45129566 #
vessenes ◴[] No.45123833[source]
oAI rev exceeds $1b per month right now.
replies(1): >>45124075 #
gloosx ◴[] No.45124075[source]
still not profitable? All this revenue is burned on compute
replies(2): >>45124199 #>>45124286 #
baq ◴[] No.45124286{3}[source]
Individual models are probably profitable because why not.

Not staying behind is the expensive part.

replies(1): >>45124363 #
gloosx ◴[] No.45124363{4}[source]
Expensive part is providing the services at loss to get the biggest part of the market, which is the current state of affairs. At some point the market leader will emerge and it will price things according to the actual cost of running this thing + markup, and ALL efforts would be going into squeezing as much profit as possible from the leading position. At the same time usability and quality would not be priority anymore. We are enjoying the late-capitalism at it's peak here.
replies(2): >>45124685 #>>45125025 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45125025{5}[source]
> providing the services at loss to get the biggest part of the market

Would note that market share confers revenue, users and data. The last is uniquley valuable for LLM builders.