←back to thread

The staff ate it later

(en.wikipedia.org)
477 points gyomu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
operator-name ◴[] No.45108624[source]
In the west we have “No Animals Were Harmed in the making of …”, which I’m only just learning comes from the American Humane Society: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Humane_Society#No_A...

I had always thought it were a generic phrase!

replies(6): >>45109860 #>>45110340 #>>45110416 #>>45110627 #>>45112020 #>>45115141 #
germinalphrase ◴[] No.45109860[source]
Tripwiring (and thus fatally wounding) horses was quite a thing back in the day.
replies(2): >>45110158 #>>45113410 #
kulahan ◴[] No.45110158[source]
Wasn't there some horrible story about the number of animals killed in the filming of Homeward Bound or some similar movie? I simply cannot comprehend the callousness of people towards animals back then. I guess our cultures are simply too different, but it genuinely seems like people saw all animals as "things" until, like, the 1950s or something like that. What the heck?
replies(9): >>45110259 #>>45111281 #>>45111404 #>>45112272 #>>45112342 #>>45113024 #>>45113377 #>>45114702 #>>45127735 #
adriand ◴[] No.45111281[source]
> I guess our cultures are simply too different, but it genuinely seems like people saw all animals as "things" until, like, the 1950s or something like that.

There’s a weird disconnect where people ignore or are wilfully ignorant of cruelty to animals in industrial food production but are sensitive to it in virtually every other context. I saw a woman the other day who was tending to an injured pigeon and had called animal welfare people to come tend to it. Meanwhile, millions of chickens live in appalling conditions and die horrible deaths en masse.

I am genuinely unsure where this disconnect comes from. I was the same for most of my life but a few years ago, I started thinking about the animals I was eating and then I couldn’t eat them any more.

I don’t begrudge people their compassion. A few nights ago I went outside to put some stuff on the barbecue and my wife was in the backyard, concerned for the fate of a female cardinal that had flown into our sunroom window. It was stunned and couldn’t fly. Its mate was worriedly flitting through nearby bushes. “That’s so sad,” my wife said. “Yes,” I agreed, and then I put her skewers of meat on the barbecue.

replies(6): >>45111664 #>>45112051 #>>45112110 #>>45112610 #>>45112633 #>>45113442 #
keiferski ◴[] No.45112051[source]
It is mostly just proximity and framing. A hurt wild animal is alive and right in front of you. Meat from the grocery store is a prepackaged product that isn’t mentally associated with the bloody process behind the scenes required to get it there. The commercial aspect is pretty dependent on this distancing.

Case-in-point: I once stayed in a small town in Morocco for a few weeks. There wasn’t a grocery store nearby, just a market, and if you wanted chicken, they killed it in front of you. Needless to say, being directly confronted with the process…I didn’t eat meat the entire time.

replies(2): >>45113432 #>>45116456 #
dotancohen ◴[] No.45116456[source]

  > if you wanted chicken, they killed it in front of you. Needless to say, being directly confronted with the process…I didn’t eat meat the entire time.
The one time I had opportunity to kill a bird with my own hands and eat it, I ate it with far greater respect and less waste than any meat I'd ever even before or since. I wish there were an efficient way to bring the consumer closer to the animal in everyday Western society. I doubt that we would consume less meat, but we would certainly have more respect for it.
replies(1): >>45124325 #
1. pegasus ◴[] No.45124325[source]
They would definitely waste less of it, and probably consume less as well.