←back to thread

We're Joining OpenAI

(www.alexcodes.app)
192 points liurenju | 7 comments | 03 Sep 25 18:38 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
CyberMacGyver ◴[03 Sep 25 20:45 UTC] No.45120228[source]▶
At this rate it’s better to start a company and get aquihired vs applying and getting hired.

Seems like OpenAI speed ran through the Facebook phase and are out of ideas

replies(5): >>45120368 #>>45120639 #>>45123216 #>>45124631 #>>45125345 #
kridsdale3 ◴[03 Sep 25 21:00 UTC] No.45120368[source]▶
Au contraire, based on their recent hires, they're just beginning their Facebook phase. Expect to see a lot of ads 2 years from now, and expect to see a LOT of money being made by the company a year after that.

If they can maintain runway until then.

replies(13): >>45120439 #>>45120462 #>>45120737 #>>45120923 #>>45121451 #>>45123833 #>>45124176 #>>45124207 #>>45124568 #>>45125196 #>>45127156 #>>45128868 #>>45129566 #
1. bilekas ◴[04 Sep 25 06:29 UTC] No.45124207[source]▶
From my perspective, I'm so tired of ads being the main source of revenue on the internet. If they're added to chatgpt for example I will most definitely be moving to another that has no ads. Probably I don't represent the masses but I hate this rush to the bottom with adverts.
replies(2): >>45124280 #>>45124613 #
2. baq ◴[04 Sep 25 06:41 UTC] No.45124280[source]▶
Ads are a way to get money from users who don’t want to pay with their money. You can’t beat free on price and crucially you can’t beat free on convenience - paying even 1 cent above free introduces complexity and friction.

Solve this and you’ll solve the ad problem, but I’m afraid it isn’t possible because money involves controls and regulations which you can’t weasel out of and not end up in jail.

replies(2): >>45124412 #>>45124663 #
3. ◴[04 Sep 25 07:03 UTC] No.45124412[source]▶
4. wickedsight ◴[04 Sep 25 07:34 UTC] No.45124613[source]▶
I was watching a TV show on Prime for the past months. They introduced ads last month and I instantly returned to piracy for this specific show. I hope my main steaming service (for local content) doesn't get the same idea. I'd happily pay extra if they add 4k, but I don't like being extorted into paying (over 50%) more for the same service.
5. aucisson_masque ◴[04 Sep 25 07:42 UTC] No.45124663[source]▶
What about tiers like YouTube lite where you pay and you still see advertisement ?

How does that fit in your price model because to me it makes no sense at all yet people buy that. Same for Netflix tier with ads.

replies(2): >>45124723 #>>45125352 #
6. baq ◴[04 Sep 25 07:48 UTC] No.45124723{3}[source]▶
There's money to take, maybe, so why not take it.
7. ◴[04 Sep 25 09:35 UTC] No.45125352{3}[source]▶