←back to thread

181 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
crabl ◴[] No.45116788[source]
It's interesting to me that those fonts seem to include ink traps: curious if this has anything to do with the display tech that's used in the cockpit
replies(8): >>45116819 #>>45117004 #>>45117069 #>>45117277 #>>45117429 #>>45117455 #>>45119432 #>>45128833 #
nonethewiser ◴[] No.45117004[source]
I had not heard of ink traps. Basically, they are characters that try to account for ink bleeding. By putting more negative space in corners, for example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ink_trap

But that gives me the impression it would have nothing to do with displays. And makes it a pretty curious choice.

Although I personally dont see any ink traps from the font linked in the comments https://fonts.google.com/specimen/B612

replies(1): >>45117078 #
whalesalad ◴[] No.45117078[source]
Set font size slider to 300px and you will notice them. I'd love to see the study that decided this was the right move. For a digital display its just noise and won't even render correctly at small sizes without a high dpi display. I doubt they would do this just for stylistic purposes. Seems like a very odd decision to me.
replies(2): >>45117182 #>>45121392 #
1. Nextgrid ◴[] No.45121392[source]
I wonder if it’s a mitigation for common visual conditions or for better viewing in high-vibration environments?