←back to thread

677 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
extr ◴[] No.45117263[source]
Zed is so great, I do wish they would focus just a little bit more on bringing the UI just a bit more up to parity with VS Code, I would switch full time.
replies(3): >>45117325 #>>45117438 #>>45118430 #
sirodoht ◴[] No.45117325[source]
What do you feel is missing from the UI?
replies(8): >>45117370 #>>45117454 #>>45117649 #>>45117711 #>>45117750 #>>45118013 #>>45118359 #>>45118829 #
tmdh ◴[] No.45117370[source]
I feel like the UI is not as smooth as VSCode. There is a slight lag when scrolling.
replies(4): >>45117436 #>>45117474 #>>45117479 #>>45117502 #
rtaylorgarlock ◴[] No.45117479[source]
Wow. This might be the 1st time i've seen someone comment negatively regarding UI performance. Zed is one of the fastest programs i use. I used to laugh when seeing them market fps and such, but yeesh it's fast
replies(1): >>45118237 #
hu3 ◴[] No.45118237[source]
> Wow. This might be the 1st time i've seen someone comment negatively regarding UI performance

Here you go: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

> I found Copilot tab completion completion to be VERY slow in Zed, for some reason.

> Zed still takes a relatively long time to start on my old desktop. I thought something was wrong but no, it is just THAT slow

> I have tried it out and by default it was so slow as to be unusable. After discovering it required some customization in /etc (because it's the only GUI application that fails to recognize my GPU on a very popular distro with next to zero customization, because I game a lot on Linux - weird how that's a me problem and not a Zed problem) it got better, but still noticeably slower than VS Code.

> I mean, good AI tab completion feels like a super power. Zed’s is not that good. It’s slow and normally not at all what I want.

> Zed tab is a lot worse in comparison (partly because it’s slow)

> In my personal experience I couldn't use Zed for editing python. Firstly, when navigating in a large python repository, looking up references was extremely slow (sometimes on the order of minutes).

> All I'm saying is that contrary to what someone else said about the software being "fast" I tried it and at startup, it was unusably slow.

> Tried using zed on Linux (pop os, Nvidia) several months ago, was terribly slow, ~1s to open right click context window.

> Zed is as close as it gets, I also use it, but it is still slow and cumbersome sometimes.

I'll stop here. There are other 4 pages of comments to pick anecdotes from, in this simple search alone.

replies(2): >>45118937 #>>45119841 #
cyanf ◴[] No.45118937[source]
The other examples you listed are valid, but A.I tab auto complete is a model & inference issue unrelated to the editor.
replies(2): >>45119374 #>>45119600 #
1. rvnx ◴[] No.45119374[source]
It is a feature that they control. Whether it comes from the model, a bad prompt, a bad provider or a bug in their implementation is their responsibility (especially considering you have to pay per-request AI features).
replies(1): >>45119699 #
2. cyanf ◴[] No.45119699[source]
That’s true if we’re evaluating Zed as a product, but the GP is discussing Zed U.I perf specifically.