Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    677 points meetpateltech | 17 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
    Show context
    extr ◴[] No.45117263[source]
    Zed is so great, I do wish they would focus just a little bit more on bringing the UI just a bit more up to parity with VS Code, I would switch full time.
    replies(3): >>45117325 #>>45117438 #>>45118430 #
    sirodoht ◴[] No.45117325[source]
    What do you feel is missing from the UI?
    replies(8): >>45117370 #>>45117454 #>>45117649 #>>45117711 #>>45117750 #>>45118013 #>>45118359 #>>45118829 #
    1. tmdh ◴[] No.45117370[source]
    I feel like the UI is not as smooth as VSCode. There is a slight lag when scrolling.
    replies(4): >>45117436 #>>45117474 #>>45117479 #>>45117502 #
    2. Longhanks ◴[] No.45117436[source]
    Wait what? Isn't a super fast UI one of their main selling points, what led them to write their own rendering in Rust?

    ...and now they lose to a web app?

    replies(3): >>45117487 #>>45117533 #>>45117622 #
    3. mlnj ◴[] No.45117474[source]
    Smoothness and frames per second is the core of why they were building a very optimized editor. Not sure if it is just your machine that it is not leveraging the right bits.

    For me the extension ecosystems is something I really like about VSCode, but that is an entirely different matter.

    4. rtaylorgarlock ◴[] No.45117479[source]
    Wow. This might be the 1st time i've seen someone comment negatively regarding UI performance. Zed is one of the fastest programs i use. I used to laugh when seeing them market fps and such, but yeesh it's fast
    replies(1): >>45118237 #
    5. seanssel ◴[] No.45117487[source]
    I have no idea what they're talking about. Maybe they're used to a smooth scroll animation in VS Code or something? Zed feels snappier/lighter in just about every way to me.
    replies(1): >>45117524 #
    6. macawfish ◴[] No.45117502[source]
    This could be an issue with GPU drivers. I experienced some incompatibility with GPU kernel drivers that allowed Zed to crash the whole window manager during text selection.
    7. sayrer ◴[] No.45117524{3}[source]
    No kidding. It is /so/ fast. It has remote development like VS Code, and most of the features I use, so it's my main thing now. Claude Code was the only thing that made me wince, since I wondered if I was living in the dark ages. VS Code of course has many more extensions, but I don't use that many.
    8. sapiogram ◴[] No.45117533[source]
    There's a reason everyone writes their GUI apps in Electron nowadays. Browser have spent 30 years figuring out fast rendering, it's hard to beat that, even with native code.
    replies(1): >>45119382 #
    9. ◴[] No.45117622[source]
    10. hu3 ◴[] No.45118237[source]
    > Wow. This might be the 1st time i've seen someone comment negatively regarding UI performance

    Here you go: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

    > I found Copilot tab completion completion to be VERY slow in Zed, for some reason.

    > Zed still takes a relatively long time to start on my old desktop. I thought something was wrong but no, it is just THAT slow

    > I have tried it out and by default it was so slow as to be unusable. After discovering it required some customization in /etc (because it's the only GUI application that fails to recognize my GPU on a very popular distro with next to zero customization, because I game a lot on Linux - weird how that's a me problem and not a Zed problem) it got better, but still noticeably slower than VS Code.

    > I mean, good AI tab completion feels like a super power. Zed’s is not that good. It’s slow and normally not at all what I want.

    > Zed tab is a lot worse in comparison (partly because it’s slow)

    > In my personal experience I couldn't use Zed for editing python. Firstly, when navigating in a large python repository, looking up references was extremely slow (sometimes on the order of minutes).

    > All I'm saying is that contrary to what someone else said about the software being "fast" I tried it and at startup, it was unusably slow.

    > Tried using zed on Linux (pop os, Nvidia) several months ago, was terribly slow, ~1s to open right click context window.

    > Zed is as close as it gets, I also use it, but it is still slow and cumbersome sometimes.

    I'll stop here. There are other 4 pages of comments to pick anecdotes from, in this simple search alone.

    replies(2): >>45118937 #>>45119841 #
    11. cyanf ◴[] No.45118937{3}[source]
    The other examples you listed are valid, but A.I tab auto complete is a model & inference issue unrelated to the editor.
    replies(2): >>45119374 #>>45119600 #
    12. rvnx ◴[] No.45119374{4}[source]
    It is a feature that they control. Whether it comes from the model, a bad prompt, a bad provider or a bug in their implementation is their responsibility (especially considering you have to pay per-request AI features).
    replies(1): >>45119699 #
    13. ◴[] No.45119382{3}[source]
    14. fkyoureadthedoc ◴[] No.45119600{4}[source]
    Idk if 'linux + gpu = problem' is surprising or very relevant either.
    15. cyanf ◴[] No.45119699{5}[source]
    That’s true if we’re evaluating Zed as a product, but the GP is discussing Zed U.I perf specifically.
    16. coder543 ◴[] No.45119841{3}[source]
    > Here you go

    That is a list of search results of people complaining that VS Code is slow compared to Zed.

    replies(1): >>45125674 #
    17. hu3 ◴[] No.45125674{4}[source]
    There are tons of complains about zed performance there.

    Do you think messages like this are talking about VSCode performance?

    > In my personal experience I couldn't use Zed for editing python. Firstly, when navigating in a large python repository, looking up references was extremely slow (sometimes on the order of minutes).