←back to thread

677 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
extr ◴[] No.45117263[source]
Zed is so great, I do wish they would focus just a little bit more on bringing the UI just a bit more up to parity with VS Code, I would switch full time.
replies(3): >>45117325 #>>45117438 #>>45118430 #
TheRoque ◴[] No.45117438[source]
What's so great about zed ?
replies(4): >>45117489 #>>45117862 #>>45118952 #>>45124588 #
simonw ◴[] No.45117489[source]
It uses a fraction of the memory of VS Code and is much faster to launch.
replies(3): >>45117638 #>>45118055 #>>45118794 #
johnisgood ◴[] No.45117638[source]
Zed still takes a relatively long time to start on my old desktop. I thought something was wrong but no, it is just THAT slow. Emacs starts up faster than an empty Zed window, unfortunately. It is still way faster than IntelliJ but comparing it to that is a low bar.

VSCodium starts up faster for me than Zed which I compiled yesterday with release mode. Here I am referring to the time spent just on waiting for the window to start up, not the extensions and all that I am using with VSCodium, that takes time. I wonder why this is, that VSCodium shows the window quicker than Zed.

Regardless, I will give Zed a try with Go development. I assume Zed has extensions, too? Are there any extensions for Go? If so, I might replace VSCodium with Zed but only if it has similar features to VSCodium. If not, I will stick to VSCodium as there is no reason for me to change.

replies(2): >>45117908 #>>45117953 #
yobert ◴[] No.45117908[source]
Zed has easy to use extensions, but also Go support is built in. (syntax highlighting, gofmt on save, and language server support)
replies(1): >>45118859 #
1. johnisgood ◴[] No.45118859[source]
It's builtin? Nice. I will give it a try, then!

I wonder why the startup time is slow though, may have to debug that one.