←back to thread

181 points Bogdanp | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.005s | source
Show context
jelder ◴[] No.45116692[source]
What it actually looks like: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/B612
replies(6): >>45116769 #>>45116814 #>>45116918 #>>45116925 #>>45117098 #>>45117894 #
polishdude20 ◴[] No.45116769[source]
Funny how it's supposed to be designed to be legible. I read that as "disengage" at first rather than "disregard"
replies(2): >>45116857 #>>45116872 #
octo888 ◴[] No.45116857[source]
Not just me. Maybe it's how it's displayed on the web. I had an immediate "this is awful" response LOL
replies(1): >>45118078 #
1. fmajid ◴[] No.45118078[source]
The kerning is not great, for starters
replies(1): >>45118943 #
2. atoav ◴[] No.45118943[source]
Legible != Readable

Legability means you have to be able to differenciate words and letters. With a font specialized for aerospace use that probably also mean it has to retain that quality when printed on panels.

A special requirement I would think of is legability while in motion. Try taking your favourite, perfectly kerned font and reading it while shaking your head wildly in poor light conditions, then you get a hint of why this font isn't optimized for looks.